Every four years, the students of Lund come together to organize the Lund Carnival. For a few days, a park fills with tents where all kinds of festive activities take place. The person in charge of making this happen is the carnival general.

In total, there have been $N$ carnivals, each with a different general. The generals are numbered from $0$ to $N − 1$ in chronological order. Every general $i$ has given their opinion on how good their predecessors were, by publishing a ranking of the generals $0, 1,…,i − 1$ in order from best to worst.

The next Lund Carnival will be in 2026. In the meantime, all past carnival generals have gathered to take a group photo. However, it would be awkward if generals $i$ and $j \ ($where $i < j)$ end up next to each other if $i$ is **strictly** in the second half of $j$'s ranking.

For example:

- If general $4$ has given the ranking
`3 2 1 0`

, then $4$ can stand next to $3$, or $2$, but not $1$ or $0$. - If general $5$ has given the ranking
`4 3 2 1 0`

, then $5$ can stand next to $4, 3$ or $2$, but not $1$ or $0$. Note that it is fine if one general is exactly in the middle of another's ranking.

The following figure illustrates sample 1. Here, general $5$ stands next to generals $2$ and $3$, and general $4$ stands next to general $2$ only.

You are given the rankings that the generals published. Your task is to arrange the generals $0, 1,…, N − 1$ in a row, so that if $i$ and $j$ are adjacent $($where $i < j)$ then $i$ is **not** strictly in the second half of $j$'s ranking.

## Input

The first line contains the positive integer $N$, the number of generals.

The following $N − 1$ lines contain the rankings. The first of these lines contains general $1$'s ranking, the second line contains general $2$'s ranking, and so on until general $N − 1$. General $0$ is absent since general $0$ didn't have any predecessors to rank.

The ranking of general $i$ is a list with $i$ integers $p_{i, 0}, p_{i, 1}, …, p_{i, i - 1}$ in which every integer from $0$ to $i − 1$ occurs exactly once. Specifically, $p_{i, 0}$ is the best and $p_{i, i - 1}$ is the worst general according to general $i$.

Print a list of integers, an ordering of the numbers $0, 1,…, N − 1$, such that for each pair of adjacent numbers, neither is strictly in the second half of the other's ranking.

It can be proven that a solution always exists. If there are multiple solutions, you may print any of them.

## Constraints and Scoring

- $1 \leq N \leq 1 \ 000$
- $0 \leq p_{i, 0}, p_{i, 1}, ..., p_{i, i - 1} \leq i - 1$ for $i = 0, 1, ..., N - 1$

Your solution will be tested on a set of test groups, each worth a number of points. Each test group contains a set of test cases. To get the points for a test group, you need to solve all test cases in the test group.

# | Score | Limits |
---|---|---|

1 | 11 | The ranking of general $i$ will be $i - 1, i - 2, ..., 0$ for all $i$ such that $1 ≤ i ≤ N − 1$ |

2 | 23 | The ranking of general $i$ will be $0, 1, ..., i - 1$ for all $i$ such that $1 ≤ i ≤ N − 1$ |

3 | 29 | $N \leq 8$ |

4 | 37 | No additional constraints. |

## Example 1

`stdin`

```
6
0
1 0
2 1 0
3 2 1 0
4 3 2 1 0
```

`stdout`

```
4 2 5 3 1 0
```

### Explication

The first sample matches the condition of test group $1$. In this sample, neither general $2$ nor $3$ can stand next to general $0$, and neither general $4$ nor $5$ can stand next to generals $0$ and $1$. The sample output was illustrated in the figure above.

## Example 2

`stdin`

```
5
0
0 1
0 1 2
0 1 2 3
```

`stdout`

```
2 0 4 1 3
```

### Explication

The second sample matches the condition of test group $2$. In this sample, general $2$ can't stand next to general $1$, general $3$ can't stand next to general $2$, and general $4$ can't stand next to generals $3$ and $2$.

## Example 3

`stdin`

```
4
0
1 0
0 2 1
```

`stdout`

```
3 0 1 2
```

### Explication

The third sample matches the condition of test group $3$. In this sample, the only pairs of generals that can't stand next to each other are $(1, 3)$ and $(0, 2)$. Hence, there are no conflicts if they are arranged `3 0 1 2`

. Another possible answer is `0 1 2 3`

.